Simpliphi and NFPA 855

Post Reply
pss
Forum Emperor
Posts: 1213
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 8:40 am
My RE system: 8330 watts in three strings, Flexmax 60 x 3, Radian 8048A, GSLC load center, Mate 3S, Hub 10.3, FN-DC and 900 Amp, 48V Trojan T105-RE battery bank.

Simpliphi and NFPA 855

Post by pss »

So I want to swap out my aging FLA bank for a lithium battery bank. I have 2 major sources, maybe more where I can just pick them up the batteries locally and avoid any freight or shipping charges. So I have been looking at the Homegrid stack, the Fortress Power eVault Max and the Simpliphi 3.8-48-M. It seems that from a comparison point of view, the Homegrid would be limited to a 4 stack under NFPA 855, but I would just need to connect the +/- to my big copper buss bar. But if i want to go beyond 4 according to NFPA 855, I would need a second stack. And each stack has to be 6 feet from combustibles in my garage and three feet from the walls and each other. Sort of sticking out in the middle of the floor. The Fortress power unit would have the same issues regarding placement of more than 1 unit. The Simpliphi on the other hand could be placed onto the wall, but NFPA defines batters as a "cluster" also limiting them to 20 kWh. So I could get 5 of them, but not six. The battery cabinets from Simpliphi along with buss bars are costly and the 6 space cabinet violates NFPA 855 by kW rating if filled. If I put the 5 units on the wall in a cluster, them Simpliphi wants 5 positive and 5 negative cables of equal lengths to land on the buss bars. So that cost plus their wall mounts adds a lot to the total.

Since I am connecting to a Radian, I don't need communicating batteries at this time. It also seems that the Simpliphi by specs seems to be a more durable battery in terms of promised cycles and the actual battery quality. But, If i want to add more than 5 to my system, I have to space them out on the wall away from the others meaning longer buss landings.

So I am looking for input from people who may have pondered this situation already. I called Simpliphi and Homegrid and they are basically ignorant of the NFPA 855. They only know UL9540 and 9540A.
provo
Forum Emperor
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:34 pm
My RE system: 16 Evergreen EC-120 (4 strings, total 1920W)
2 SimpliPhi 3.8-m-24V (150Ah each)
One FM80
One VFXR3524A
Hub 10
Mate3s
FNDC
Honda EU3000is generator
Grid connection, no selling back
Location: Sierra foothills

Re: Simpliphi and NFPA 855

Post by provo »

pss wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2023 2:22 pm I called Simpliphi and Homegrid and they are basically ignorant of the NFPA 855. They only know UL9540 and 9540A.
I'd bet the AHJ around here is also :lol: .
fcwlp
Forum Emperor
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:40 am
My RE system: GS8048A, FM80 w/3,600W PV Fixed, FM80 w/2,700W on Zomeworks tracker, Mate3, 24 Trojan 2V L16 1100AH @ C20, Grid-Tied with Kohler 14RESA LPG Generator and MEP-803 Diesel if needed.

I install and maintain grid-tied and off-grid systems in my area and consult on solar system design/operation.
Location: 80 miles NE of Phoenix at 5500'

Re: Simpliphi and NFPA 855

Post by fcwlp »

pss wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2023 2:22 pm And each stack has to be 6 feet from combustibles in my garage and three feet from the walls and each other. Sort of sticking out in the middle of the floor.
Don't forget the bollards so that you don't run into them with your car. :smile:
.
Oh how I enjoy my AHJ which does not even permit or inspect off-grid systems and is on 2011 NFPA 70 NEC. FYI, I refuse the install any lithium NMC batteries, which is what so much of the latest NFPA 855 is geared towards.
raysun
Forum Emperor
Posts: 9546
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 5:57 am
My RE system: Flexpower Two: (2) FXR3048A-01 - Series Stacked, (2) FM80, MATE3s, FlexNetDC
6 SimpliPhi 3.8-48 (48v @ 75AH. 450AH total)
Outback IBR3 battery enclosure
REC Alpha 440W panels - 2 arrays: each of 4 strings of 2 in series
2 Midnite Solar MNPV6 combiners w/20A DC disconnects.
Honda EU7000is gas fuel generator
Off-Grid

Re: Simpliphi and NFPA 855

Post by raysun »

I refuse the install any lithium NMC batteries, which is what so much of the latest NFPA 855 is geared towards.
I couldn't read the code, but was wondering if there was a distinction between the various lithium chemistries. (My money's on "No".)

I do believe I would put 5 Phi 3.8-48 in place for inspection.
Afterwards I'd install the balance of the battery. But that's just me.
SumPowerRays
Forum Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:48 pm
My RE system: Off Grid (1) Flexpower Radian 8048A-300AFCI:
GS8048A-01 Inverter/Charger 8.0 kW, 48 VDC FLEXpower Radian AFCI, pre- wired GSLC with 120/240 VAC Bypass, 175 Amp DC breakers, 125 Amp charge controller breakers, 80 Amp PV breaker, MATE3s, HUB 10.3, FN-DC, RTS, plus two FLEXmax 100 AFCI charge control.
(12) Northstar Blue 190FT batteries 606 AH @ 20 hour rate, 26.4 kw total
(24) REC 365NP2 Panels. (4) Arrays of 2190 watts each.
(2) MNPV6-250 Combiners
(2) MNSPD-300-DC Midnite surge suppressor.
Location: Washington State

Re: Simpliphi and NFPA 855

Post by SumPowerRays »

I believe all you need to do is seperate the battery banks with a 4 hour firewall. 8x8x16 CMU filled with grout, place one bank on one side of the CMU wall and the other bank on the other side. Conduit between wall would need firestopping rated for the 4 hour wall.

Edit: ESS can't be installed in habitable spaces.
pss
Forum Emperor
Posts: 1213
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 8:40 am
My RE system: 8330 watts in three strings, Flexmax 60 x 3, Radian 8048A, GSLC load center, Mate 3S, Hub 10.3, FN-DC and 900 Amp, 48V Trojan T105-RE battery bank.

Re: Simpliphi and NFPA 855

Post by pss »

In a google search box, type this in:

326a nfpa 2020.pdf

In the results of the search, about 3-4 down you should see:

NFPA 2020 - County of San Diego

should come up. Click on it and you will get a download of the NFPA 855 regulation to read.

I am installing in my garage which has a sprinkler system and drywall.

So maybe we can go further on this topic after being a little more up to speed.

This regulation is the way in California. I am not certain if the code inspectors even know how to inspect for this standard or since it is a fire prevention code, if it is the responsibility of Cal Fire to now inspect an installed ESS for compliance with this code. How would they even know to do an inspection since they are not part of permitting? However, the big elephant in the room is what happens if the code is not followed, a fire does break out, damages occur and maybe even injury to a person. Who pays and who is liable? I can just see my insurance company doing everything possible to get out of paying a claim. Property insurers ask what breed of dog you have. Soon I expect they will ask if you have an ESS, and if so what brand, age, capacity, etc. as a risk factor for insurance. Maybe they even include it as a policy exclusion in case of fire. sort of like the mold route.
Post Reply