good afternoon I have a question with the fm100 gfci controller

Discussion about the FM100 AFCI Charge Controller
Post Reply
luisoutback
Forum Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:11 pm
My RE system: 1 fm100 AFCI
2 vfxr3648a
1 FNDC
24 PV TRINA SOLAR 250
4 BATTERY DEKA SOLAR 225 GEL
GRID TIE

good afternoon I have a question with the fm100 gfci controller

Post by luisoutback »

good afternoon I have a question with the fm100 gfci controller. I'm testing it I've been 5 days with the fm100 afci I have noticed that being in float it is cloudy entering 1200 watts in pv when the sun rises and it rises to 4000 watts being it is float 53.4 battery voltage rises to 58.0 volts in batteries and it stays like that for a while in that voltage I have it in griedtie is it normal?
luisoutback
Forum Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:11 pm
My RE system: 1 fm100 AFCI
2 vfxr3648a
1 FNDC
24 PV TRINA SOLAR 250
4 BATTERY DEKA SOLAR 225 GEL
GRID TIE

Re: good afternoon I have a question with the fm100 gfci controller

Post by luisoutback »

I have also noticed that when I check the mate it tells me that it gave an hour and twenty-four minutes
absorb in OPTICS tells me it gave 3 hours
mattyxp@yahoo.com
Forum Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2021 12:11 pm
My RE system: Mate3s
VFX3648 x2 units master/slave setup
Flexmax100 afci x 2 units
32 REC360aa alpha solar panels with total wattage of 11,520w
20kw backup generator

Re: good afternoon I have a question with the fm100 gfci controller

Post by mattyxp@yahoo.com »

I have also just installed/upgraded to two new Flexmax100 afci charge controllers and I also see that OpticsRE always shows about twice the amount of "Absorb" time from what the actual amount of "Absorb" time is shown on each Flexmax100 charge controller status display in OpticsRE.
OutBack Power...please fix this bug as it causes great concern seeing double the actual amount of Absorb time being reported on the OpticsRE "Power Flow" chart when placing the mouse cursor on the Inverters in the flow chart.
Post Reply